Dealing with useless AI answers
Generic AI output? Vague summaries? Hallucinations? The full troubleshooting flow for getting better AI answers.
Local AI is amazing. But sometimes the model gives you something generic, vague, or just plain weird. "This was a meaningful week with various activities." "You experienced many emotions." "It rained on Tuesday and that was important to you."
This page is the troubleshooting flow.
Step 1: Diagnose The Output
Before fixing anything, identify which failure mode you're seeing:
| Symptom | Likely cause |
|---|---|
| Generic / platitudes | Model is too small, OR not enough input context |
| Hallucinations (made-up events) | Model is too small, OR prompt is too vague |
| Repetitive phrases | Model temperature too low (rare; defaults are fine) |
| Off-topic / random | Wrong model selected for the task |
| Empty / blank output | Ollama isn't running, or wrong model name |
Lots of <thinking> tags showing | Response cleaning didn't catch your model's format — see Step 6 |
| Cut off mid-sentence | Hit token limit — see Step 7 |
Step 2: Try A Better Model First
This fixes 80% of complaints.
The single biggest cause of vague AI output is using phi4-mini for synthesis tasks (weekly+ summaries, Q&A). It's a fast model, not a smart model.
Upgrade by going to Choosing Your AI Models and changing your weekly / monthly / Q&A models to:
phi4(~9 GB) — strong upgrademistral:instruct(~4 GB) — different flavor, also goodllama3.1:8b(~5 GB) — solid all-rounder
Re-run the AI button. Most "useless AI answer" complaints disappear here.
Step 3: Check Your Input
Garbage in, garbage out. If your daily entry was:
"good day"
The AI literally has nothing to work with. The system prompt tells it to use specific events, but if there are none, it'll either invent some or shrug.
Fix: write a few sentences. The AI doesn't need novels — but two or three concrete things (what you did, who you saw, how you felt) are the minimum for good output.
Step 4: Tune The Prompt
If you've upgraded the model and your inputs are good but the output is still off, the prompt is the next lever.
Go to Customizing AI Prompts and try:
- Adding "Be specific. Use only events explicitly mentioned." — fights hallucination
- Setting word count limits — "Output exactly 80 words."
- Asking for a specific structure — "Output 3 sentences: one about emotional shape, one about main events, one about what stood out."
- Forbidding specific phrases — "Do not use the words 'meaningful', 'special', or 'important'."
Iterate one variable at a time.
Step 5: Adjust Chunking
If your weekly+ summaries are missing details from individual days, chunking is dropping context. Go to Chunking Settings Explained and:
- Increase
detailedWordCount(default 150 → try 250) - Turn on
useDailyChunksForMonthif you haven't already - Verify
maxTokensPerOperationmatches your model's context window
Step 6: Output Has <thinking> Or Other Artifacts
Some models (especially DeepSeek-R1 variants) emit thinking tags before the answer. Time Garden's response cleaner removes the common ones, but if a new model has a new format, the artifacts can leak through.
Fix: switch to a non-reasoning model (e.g., phi4, mistral:instruct, llama3.1). Those don't produce thinking tags.
If you really want to use a reasoning model, you can manually edit the output, or wait for the cleaner to be updated in a future Time Garden version.
Step 7: Output Cuts Off
If summaries trail off mid-sentence, you've hit your model's output token limit. Two fixes:
- Shorten what you ask for. A 5-sentence summary won't cut off; a 5-paragraph one might.
- Use a model with a longer context window. Most modern models have plenty; if you're on something tiny, upgrade.
Step 8: Output Is Empty
If the AI button does nothing or returns blank output:
- Verify Ollama is running. (Mac: llama icon in menu bar; Windows: Task Manager → Ollama.)
- Verify the model is installed:
ollama listin your terminal. - Check the model name in Time Garden settings exactly matches one from
ollama list. - See AI not responding / Ollama issues for the deeper diagnostic flow.
Step 9: Q&A Specifically Feels Off
For Q&A, the answer quality depends on:
- The question's specificity — "How was my month?" gets a generic recap; "What did I worry about that turned out fine?" gets gold
- The chunking strategy for that period (see Chunking Settings Explained)
- Whether Include Highlights / Ideas / Progress are toggled on (see Customizing AI Prompts)
Try rephrasing the question with a temporal anchor ("the first half of the month", "the week of the move") and watch quality jump.
Step 10: Last Resort — Just Edit It
The AI output is regular text in your note.
If the alias the AI generated is mostly right but one word feels off, just rewrite that word. The AI is a draft assistant, not a final judge. The journal is yours.
Many users let the AI run, then spend 30 seconds adjusting before moving on. That's a perfectly good workflow.
When To Just Skip AI Entirely
Some weeks the AI just won't get the vibe right. That's fine. Write the summary by hand. Set the rating from your gut. Skip Wheel of Life this week. Time Garden's structure works with or without Eternal — see What is Time Garden?.
Up Next
- Choosing Your AI Models — the biggest quality lever
- Customizing AI Prompts — finer tuning
- AI not responding / Ollama issues — when the AI isn't responding at all